The word Photoshop usually conjures up one of two distinct responses. “Wow!” or “Yuck, cheater!”. Some deride the famous Adobe software as a shortcut to good photography. Others embrace it as the cure to bad photography. “Ah, I can photoshop it later.” (Please forgive me for using the software title as a verb.)
I preach the virtue of getting it right on camera and I am down right religious about this. Anyone who shoots with me will know how much I detest, bad framing, under and over exposures. Am I always perfect? Far from it, but at each shoot I work hard to be as close as I can.
With the same breath that I preach “getting it right on camera” I proudly proclaim my undying love for Photoshop. Am I a hypocrite? Am I contradicting myself?
I think of photography as a beautiful woman. No matter how beautiful she is, having her nicely dressed, styled and prepared only enhances her beauty. This is where Photoshop comes in for me. As a photographer, I would use every tool at my disposal to move my craft forward. If there is something that can bring an additional stop of details from a dark or overblown area, trust me, I would learn it and use it. Photoshop, and recently Lightroom as well, are tools that I embrace.
While I am not a guru or expert in Photoshop, I know enough. Mostly importantly, I know the feel and message I want to communicate through an image. I work closely with my digital artist, Kah Yee, to bring my ideas to fruition.
I must add, however, that just as good make-up can make someone more beautiful, bad make-up can be disastrous. I have seen my fair share of poorly presented and awfully photoshopped prints as a judge at WPPI a month ago.
Back to finishing “Peace”. It starts with the original capture. I made sure I didn’t blow out any details especially on the skin of the subject. Also have to be certain that I maintained details in the shadows so that I am not just showing a blotch of blackness.
Don’t remember the last time I use a tripod. The downside with shooting without one is that framing is never absolutely perfect. The trade off is, I get to shoot faster. Guess I can live with that.

Cropped off the right a bit to make the picture perfectly symmetrical.

Then we burned (or darkened) and dodged (lightened). Our eyes are always drawn to the brightest spot in a picture. By burning of the surrounding, I make the lady with clasped hands a stronger subject. Then I lightened her further, bringing out details of her face and hands a bit more.

A layer of texture, a dirty wall, followed. It gave an archaic feel, like a scene captured two hundred years ago. Love the earth tone too! I am using Marcus Bell’s Texture + which comes with over 60 different textures.

Now, I selectively removed the texture from the face of and body of the lady. Otherwise the texture would detract from the image. Just add a mask in the texture layer and selectively paint the area away.

Notice how the greens behind the wall were really vibrant? Decided to tone it down slightly by desaturating it. Again, it is done selectively with a masked layer. Then I apply a touch of DQ Vintage, one of the Photoshop actions that come with the DQ Quikeys. As a final touch we dodged the pillars to open up the shadows area slightly. Voila!
I must stress that how we finish or process a picture is entirely a subjective. Very much like cooking, how much salt, pepper, seasoning, herbs we put into the mix is down to our experience, style and preference. How I did it was my style & preference. You would have your own.
Next post, I’ll talk about how I printed this fine art piece on Epson Stylus Pro 4800.
Talk to me folks…is stuff like this helpful to your photography? What else do you wanna see shared here?